theriskyshift.com

Columns & Series

George On The Higgs: Can Politics Learn A Lesson From Science?

July 22, 2012 by George in A Dog's Life with 5 Comments

Introducing George, the opinionated beagle with a penchant for the provocative. He will be penning a weekly column on TRS bringing you a little light reading for your Sunday mornings.

Higgs Boson

Politics is overcrowded with problems of unimaginable scale – environmental degradation, the pensions timebomb, social care, corruption in Africa and revolution in the Middle East. In each case, timescales are measured in the decades and half-centuries – yet politicians rarely look beyond the next election.

Science, however, seems to work inexorably and cooperatively towards the solutions to the biggest questions of the age. The Higgs Boson was proposed before David Cameron was born, and proven to exist over two years after he became Prime Minister; yet he can’t even predict with confidence what his own legislative agenda will be in three short months.

Can politics learn from science about setting & achieving far-reaching goals, and ignoring the siren calls of short-termism?

The search for the Higgs boson is a saga surpassing that of a simple scientific discovery. It is a story of science, power, money, and politics. If even one of these was missing, we’d still be looking.

First, the science. No one tribe of scientists gave us the Higgs; it was instead a multitude of disciplines all converging with a common goal – a conductorless symphony of physicists, mathematicians, engineers, programmers, experimenters, theoreticians, and more. Even competing teams of scientists worked together to build a hoard of data which, when combined, proved the existence of the final particle to a near-bulletproof level of confidence.

Fundamental science seems to be lagging behind in the money game, and this is demonstrated in the Research Excellence Framework which puts a great deal of emphasis on “Impact” and “Applicability”. Considering that the last useful particle to be discovered was the neutron in 1920, fundamental science has taken quite a blow on the money front. But somehow, dedicated scientists pushed to ensure there was enough funding to last the whole journey.

The team was not based purely at CERN, but was a global collaboration, where scientists and engineers were required to plan 20 years into the future, even guessing at times, what new technology would exist. I am not sure about you, but I can hardly see past lunch time, so I am deeply impressed by the foresight demonstrated.

Next there’s the pure commitment and patience that has gone into the project. The search for the Higgs has literally outlived governments, unlike most government policies. Scientists planned into the future and were able to prepare for it, if only we could say the same for politics.

If there is indeed a lesson to be learned from the scientific method, and in particular the discovery of the Higgs, it is that only collaboration, foresight and planning will solve the world’s most pressing problems.

But what do I know, I’m a dog.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share this post

avatar

About George

George is hungry. When he's not thinking about food, he travels the world in search of new events, discoveries and above all flavours. From innovations in the scientific community to national security matter, George has an opinion for everything. George is a beagle.

View all posts by George →

5 Comments

  1. avatar

    BenjaminGuySaundersJuly 23, 2012 at 3:34 pmReply

    George for President!

  2. avatar

    BenjaminGuySaundersJuly 23, 2012 at 3:43 pmReply

    I think it is worth noting that were such long-termism to have been a pillar of politics we would likely have confirmed the existence of the Higgs a decade ago using the super-conducting super collider cancelled by the US Congress. Imagine the damage done by that decision. Now look at the James Webb Telescope – Let’s not allow short-term politics to trump our scientific future.   

    • avatar

      VishalDecember 29, 2012 at 7:32 pmReply

      Jeff,You can look up the expected width of the bump, I think it’s very rohguly 2 GeV or so. Remember, right now the bumps are near the limit of statistical significance, not something well-resolved where you can precisely locate a peak. The numbers being quoted are also not as precise as possible. It could very well be that the ATLAS peak is near 125.5, the CMS one near 124.5. So, the small discrepancy in mass value is probably not significant.Yonghun Park,As you accumulate better statistics, if there’s a Higgs there, the statistical significance should increase. If there’s nothing there, it should decrease. Both statements are probabilistic, but with very high probability if substantially more data is accumulated.

  3. avatar

    CeciliaJuly 27, 2012 at 1:02 amReply

    Lovely GEORGE ! ! …  And, YES GEORGE for PRESIDENT ! …
     

  4. avatar

    CeciliaJuly 27, 2012 at 1:02 amReply

    … pity that George forgot to mention Latinamerica …

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Search
Sign up to our newsletter!
Vote on the latest poll…

Do you agree with the U.S. military's decision to open more combat roles to women?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Social