theriskyshift.com

Columns & Series

Is ‘Less-Than-Lethal’ Ammunition The Solution?

January 1, 2013 by Tom Hashemi in The Blog with 1 Comment

Fox News published an article today denoting a new form of ammunition about to be sold by a US company. The “Burns Round” (named after the company founder’s deceased cousin: U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Kyle Burns) is fired out of a 12-gauge shotgun and flattens on impact. Resultantly it bruises and stuns the target, hopefully avoiding fatality.

The company is marketing this new ammo specifically at police and other law enforcement officials – the catalyst for its creation was the need for ammo that wouldn’t pierce the skin of a plane in the post-9/11 armed flight marshal world.

Given the on-going debate over the Second Amendment (read mine and Peter Kelly’s thoughts on the matter here), it would be beneficial to push these developments further into the public sphere. Allowing citizenry and police to be armed with “less-than-lethal” ammunition is clearly preferable to, for example, hollow point rounds. Whilst it will not eradicate the problem or the underlying issues, it has the potential to lower the casualty rate of this pandemic.

Of course non-lethal ammunition is nothing new; police have been using rubber bullets for some time now. But it is encouraging that the U.S.’s foremost right-wing gun-toting website is shouting its praises.

Perhaps the NRA would like to join in?

Photo credit: Keoni Cabral

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Share this post

avatar

About Tom Hashemi

An alumnus of the University of Manchester (BA(Hons) Middle Eastern History) and King's College London (MA Terrorism, Security & Society), Tom is the founder of theriskyshift.com. He currently works for market research and strategic consulting firm Edelman Berland. You can find out more about him by going to tomhashemi.com or by following him on twitter. All views expressed are his alone and not of any employer or other third party (including theriskyshift.com).

View all posts by Tom Hashemi →

One Comment

  1. avatar

    Matt WahnsiedlerJanuary 5, 2013 at 12:07 amReply

    I’m not sure what it would solve. Reducing your firepower won’t appeal to most who have a weapon for home defence, especially given that criminals have access to fully lethal ammunition. No-one who keeps a firearm to prevent a tyrannical government would be sold on this either.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Search
Sign up to our newsletter!
Vote on the latest poll…

Do you agree with the U.S. military's decision to open more combat roles to women?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Social